Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(20)
The choice of perspective does not change our study conclusions.
Given the retrospective nature of our study, conclusions should be drawn with caution.
To work on complete cases should thus not majorly impact our study conclusions.
Thus, our study population was representative of the population, which increases the generalizability of our study conclusions.
However, sensitivity analysis shows only a marginal effects on cost-effectiveness results, and our study conclusions therefore remain unchanged.
We are well aware of the fact that due to the retrospective and single center-based character of our study, conclusions must be drawn with caution.
Similar(40)
A large sample and a high effective response rate seemed to be able to provide a good representation of our study population and enhance the generalization of our study conclusion.
We finished our study in "Conclusion" section by conclusion and future work.
Substantively, our study alters conclusions about parties operating in highly unstable electoral contexts.
Thus limits our study to conclusions about uniform DIF only.
Also, because of small sample size of our study, definitive conclusions could not be made.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com