Our study compared between three techniques for SFE for elevation heights of 7 mm.
The difference of WTP in our study compared to Jacobsson could be several reasons.
The admitting diagnoses were mostly infections in our study compared to cardiac and non-cardiac surgical cases in their study.
Our study compared the alveolar bone support of mandibular incisors in subjects with different vertical skeletal patterns before orthodontic treatment using CBCT.
The proportion of physicians who never used US was lower (6%%) in our study compared to previous studies (44%% in the study by Buchanan et al. [12]).
This could be due to the different percentage of rural hospitals in the overall study, being 21.5% in our study compared to 63% in Ikkersheim's.
Most of our students were females 70.4% which could explain the higher frequency of migraine in our study compared to others.
Our study compared three interventions.
Additionally to addressing the two questions mentioned above, our study, compared to previous ones, employed a different analytical method.
We cannot readily explain the lower participation in our study compared to other reports of cervical cancer screening in India.
On the other hand, the results obtained in our study compared well with previously reported uridine plasma concentrations [5], [6], [12].
