Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(16)
Our questionnaire is distributed in 148 economies, and asks people questions on ownership and use of accounts, savings, credit and payments behavior.
Conclusion: Our questionnaire is regarded as a useful tool for evaluating the QOL of the elderly.
Our questionnaire is limited to 17 questions focusing mainly on radiation dose and cancer risk of common examinations.
Our questionnaire is different from the existing Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ) in that our questionnaire enables participants to self-report their actions with items that are proverbs and sayings.
Compared to the IAB-BAMF-SOEP survey on refugees (see Brücker et al. 2016) which entails almost 450 questions, our questionnaire is fairly modest but comparable to the one performed by Buber-Ennser et al. (2016) among refugees in Austria.
He acknowledged that the group isn't always going to agree with everyone it supports financially, but that "to do the exact opposite of what he said on our questionnaire is pretty disappointing".
Similar(44)
Third, because our questionnaire was self-administered, reporting bias was possible.
Nevertheless, our questionnaire was validated in a standard way, as previously described [12].
The reliability of our questionnaire was confirmed by re-testing the same subjects.
Reliability analysis, to determine the internal consistency of our questionnaire, was evaluated by Cronbach's alpha.
Our questionnaire was based on literature review, a pilot study of six respondents and individual interviews with four respondents to test face validity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com