Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(2)
To that end, we chose to use glaucoma suspects to define our normal values since they are, in fact, the group that clinicians are most often forced to differentiate from patients with early glaucoma.
PTH was assayed using an immunoradiometric technique (DiaSorin, Stillwater, MN, USA) based on a double antibody probing of the intact molecule; our normal values were within the range of 10 55 pg/mL, with intra- and inter-assay variations of 6.5 and 9.8%, respectively.
Similar(58)
Results: Preoperative ICA volume flow was severely decreased to less than 150 mL/min in all 18 patients, in comparison with our laboratory normal value of matched age group of 250 to 300 mL/min.
Three patients had higher levels (43.79~71.21 pg/ml) and the others' were within normal range, 27.00~34.91 pg/ml (our laboratory normal value was 11.6~41.2 pg/ml).
Laboratory studies indicated that these six gynecomastia patients' serum free testosterone ranged from 356.61 to 574.60 ng/dl with a mean ± SD of 408.64 ± 82.06 ng/dl (95% CI 343.03~474.25 ng/dl), which is within the normal range (our laboratory normal value was 241~847 ng/dl).
According to Gesteiro et al. data [ 33], our newborns showed normal values of HOMAIR index in agreement with their age.
We classified high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentration according to our normal laboratory values: <0.9 mmol/l for males, <1.1 mmol/l for females.
In our study, even supra normal values of PaCO2 were significantly linked with RANTES elevation and endothelial dysfunction.
The regional peak systolic myocardial velocities in the RVs and LVs in our study correspond to normal values described previously (22, 23).
CRP, Hp and cTnI levels were classified as normal or high according to our laboratory reference values (normal values: CRP < 20 mg/L; Hp < 3 g/L; cTnI < 0.05 ng/ml).
Although our cutoff levels for normal values were based on FM patients, who do not have an inflammatory autoimmune disorder and in whom levels were comparable with those in healthy controls, this nonetheless may have introduced bias in our results.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com