Sentence examples for our argumentation is from inspiring English sources

Our argumentation is in line with Schenk (1996) and Radkau (2006), who underlined that Hessian forests were not overexploited in all areas in the 18th century.

Our argumentation is well in line with findings which underline that not all Hessian forests were overexploited in the 18th century.

A shortcoming for the use in our argumentation is that the study gives information on apparent disappearance (including degradation as well as dissipation) only and not degradation as required by Annex XIII.

In brief, our argumentation is presented in Table 1, which includes only a part of reported data in such an extensive research field.

The essence of our argumentation is that multiple losses of paralogous gene copies present in the ancestral gene pool of the LUCA community may be responsible for much of the incongruencies observed in genetic trees because it is a prediction.

We point out that our method of argumentation is much simpler than the ones used by Song and Chen [5], and Matsushita and Takahashi [6].

This line of argumentation is called an indispensability argument (Colyvan 2001).

At one level, this line of argumentation is part of an argument for the existence of God.

Dialectical approaches to argument have highlighted the extent to which argumentation is a dialogue between (real or imagined) interlocutors who argue for different points of view.

Our discussion presents a nuanced approach for the finer details of how argumentation is covered across time as well as across some key journals.

Argumentation is a good skill to have, but the real argument should be with oneself.