Sentence examples for our argumentation from inspiring English sources

In this section, we recapitulate these notions briefly, since they are an integral part of our argumentation in Sect.

Likewise, we cannot begin with abstract conceptual definitions and accordingly employ logical reasoning for the purposes of concluding our argumentation with assertions about things that exist.

For our argumentation, we cannot use arbitrary subdivisions and need very special properties of the conditional simplexes in which we subdivide.

Our argumentation is in line with Schenk (1996) and Radkau (2006), who underlined that Hessian forests were not overexploited in all areas in the 18th century.

Our argumentation is well in line with findings which underline that not all Hessian forests were overexploited in the 18th century.

Interaction effects concerning the BAF are discussed in Section 4. Here, to illustrate our argumentation, a BSS scheme has been chosen as an example for adaptive binaural filtering.

This will be used later in our argumentations.

The next proposition provides a sufficient condition to prove the pseudomonotonicity of multivalued operators and plays an important part in our argumentations.

This structural detail is important for our later argumentation.

This fact follows from our previous argumentation that the highest mutual information is attained when both the ratio of complete assembly and individual adaptor protein is well balanced and the concentrations of binary complexes are as low as possible.

Furthermore, as an extension of our previous argumentation regarding the importance of work control for fertility decision-making, it is expected that a heightened level of work control is more important in countries with less institutional support in the form of childcare availability.