Sentence examples for ought to conclude from inspiring English sources

"We probably ought to conclude that's not a very good way to hold a primary," Mr. Engler said then.

"These stories are inconclusive, we say, and proceed to frame a criticism based upon the assumption that stories ought to conclude in a way that we recognize," Virginia Woolf would later write about Chekhov.

It was only after the café had closed for the night, the chairs overturned on the tables, that the rain ceased completely, leaving Stevick with the question of whether his shift here ought to conclude.

If he is as passionate about helping the poor as he claims, Mr Wolfowitz ought to conclude that his goals for the bank will best be achieved without him.If not, the bank's political masters must push him out.

In this study we focus on what clinicians ought to conclude when they detect a blip with the more sensitive assays now commonly used for monitoring patients.

We consider the effect of different assays and of adherence on the predictive value of transient detectable viremia in an effort to better understand what a clinician ought to conclude when transient viremia is detected using these more sensitive assays.

What ought we to conclude based on this example?Certainly, one could reasonably argue that the sector would be even better if state control were relaxed, monopolies broken up, subsidies curtailed, and market controls (like those on immigration) eliminated.

"It is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of our finding certain opinions natural and familiar, or novel, and even shocking, ought not to conclude our judgment upon the question whether statutes embodying them conflict with the Constitution of the United States".

Ought we to conclude, on the basis of memory evidence, that the resulting person is not Charlie but Guy Fawkes brought back to life, or ought we instead to infer from the absence of physical continuity that he is simply Charlie with memory loss?

If that is to mean something, when campaigning resumes, the debate ought to be concluded in a serious way that reflects the gravity of the question confronting the United Kingdom.

Can rational prioritization still lead us to conclude that people ought to participate in research as a moral duty?