Otherwise, we used data that were available to us (e.g., a trial may have reported only per-protocol analysis results).
Otherwise we used mean dry density based on drill resistance.
Otherwise, we used the free form deformation (FFD) technique for the generation of the 3D shapes of the automotive part studied during the optimization process.
Otherwise, we used a random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird method).
Otherwise, we used the average value for the available period.
If available, we utilized studies with I. scapularis, but otherwise we used values for a closely related and widely studied European tick, I. ricinus.
Again, where the response variable was binary, we used a model type suitable for a binomial error structure (generalized linear model, "glm"); otherwise, we used linear models ("lm").
Unless noted otherwise, we used annotations from FlyBase Release 5.4 of the D. melanogaster genome for our analysis, including recovery of annotated ncRNAs (Table 1) and analysis of predictions in UTRs of D. melanogaster.
Otherwise we used the random-effects model.
Otherwise we used Spearman rank correlation analysis.
Otherwise we used a random effects model.
