Firstly, the OSS community developed the institutional innovation of OSS licenses enabling OSS software to survive as a common property.
Some of the measures, such as the SPADI and the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) were developed to capture joint-specific concepts and to avoid the influence of co-morbidity [ 41, 65].
Drawing on literature from many disciplines and using a theoretical framework developed for the study of environmental commons, Schweik and English examine stages of OSS development, presenting multivariate statistical models of success and abandonment.
In order to provide the aforementioned capabilities of OSS, the system is implemented and developed in four main modules: (1) A user interface module; (2) A database module; (3) A running module; (4) A connecting module.
Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) is a self-report questionnaire developed for patients having shoulder disease other than instability, and consists of 12 questions about pain and disability [ 19].
The expert committee, consisting of four forward and backward translators, two orthopedic surgeons, one rehabilitation physician, one physical therapist, one language expert and two patients with shoulder pain, reviewed the findings and developed the final SC-OSS (Appendix), which was subjected to further psychometric testing.
The Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) is a body-part-specific PROM developed in 1996 by Dawson et al. [ 28, 29].
OSS is a condition-specific self-report questionnaire developed for patients who have shoulder dysfunction other than instability.
To evaluate the quality of life in patients with shoulder pain, several constructs have been developed such as CMSOS [ 8], OSS [ 10], disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH), simple shoulder test (SST), and shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) [ 1].
For instance, threading tools are often developed with a specific OS environment, mostly Linux-like Oss, but developers could not test many different OS variants.
