Sentence examples for original studies found from inspiring English sources

The original studies found also differed according to data sources and sample sizes.

Our original studies find that activation of MEK5 (pMEK5) was increased in CRC cases.

The original study found that one in four teenagers had sexted, and that sexting was related to sexual behaviour.

A reanalysis of the database of the Epidemiological Catchment Area (ECA) study indicated that 6.4% of the general population met the criteria for bipolar spectrum (Judd and Akiskal 2003), while the original study found 0.8% for BD.

The original study found an adjusted OR of 2.7, with a 95%% confidence interval (CI) between 2.4 and 2.9.

Our original study found that fathers of children with LNHL were more likely to be radiation workers than fathers of controls.

Fourth, we have not included medication in the analyses because all patients were taking two different formulations of the same agent and the main report from the original study found no major differences in outcomes between the two formulations [ 17].

Further work using a large proportion of the patients from the original study found that SCORTEN calculated on any of the first 5 days of admission produced ROC values of over 0.8 [ 23].

All studies reporting an increased risk, including the original study, found the increased risk in one or more certain subgroups of women studied, for example women with advanced disease [ 6], women aged less than 40 years [ 7], women aged less than 40 years with family history [ 8], women aged more than 55 years [ 9], and women also carrying other genetic polymorphisms [ 10].

Interestingly, the original study found that the term of intrinsic to plasma membrane was enriched in mis-regulated genes in tumor samples [ 18], suggesting that disruption or mis-expression of genes related to plasma membrane may be involved in tumor development.

One should also point out that although our original study found significant differences in CSF C3 and FH levels between diagnostic groups, receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that neither biomarker had acceptable sensitivity or specificity (>60%) for classifying CN versus AD subjects.