Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
A discriminant function was also established: 78.4% of foxtail millet and 76.9% of green foxtail of the original grouped samples were correctly classified.
*83.4% of original grouped cases were correctly classified.
The profile of scores for the test of functions 1 through 3 resulted in correct classification of 32.5% of original grouped cases.
Classification of the selected grouped cases was correct for 70.7%, and for the unselected original grouped cases it was 71.3% correct.
Thus, in the present study, the application of quantitative parameters with the factors of age and sex to calculate the accuracy of original grouped cases correctly classified with discriminative analysis was investigated.
The discriminative analysis method was used to analyze the accuracy of the original grouped cases correctly classified by age, sex, T1 relaxation times, T2 relaxation times, and MTR values.
Similar(50)
I'm thinking of our original group.
Of the original group, only John Paul Stevens remains.
The original group swelled to hundreds, perhaps thousands, of rioters.
The original group filed suit for copyright infringement.
And it seems like some of the original group might agree with her.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com