"original emphasis" is correct and usable in written English.
It generally refers to the emphasis given to a certain word, phrase, or sentence when written by the original author. For example, "He said, 'I am not going to do it', with great emphasis on the word 'not'". Here, the original emphasis is placed on the word "not".
." Post, at 777 (original emphasis).
"I am glad that Wachtmeister has restored the original emphasis on manipulation," Dr. Dawkins said.
The original emphasis, and still the emphasis today, hasn't been on correcting behaviour but on providing security, namely from terrorists.
Still, he worried, he said, about losing sight of the original emphasis on the classics and on actor-based theater.
This was also the original emphasis of the Academy of Sciences and the school connected with it.
Restoring his original emphasis on light and openness, Mr. Makau replaced one of Mr. Zilius's exterior walls with glass, and other walls between bedrooms with Plexiglas.
Still, Clarke thinks that we should affirm with some of the early church fathers that this derivation of the Son from the Father is "not by mere Necessity of Nature, (which would be in reality Self-existence, not Filiation;) But by an Act of the Father's incomprehensible Power and Will" (141, original emphases).
And against the mainstream tradition, "The word God, in Scripture, never signifies a complex Notion of more Persons (or Intelligent Agents) than One; but always means One Person only, viz., either the Person of the Father singly, or the Person of the Son singly" (155, original emphases).
(Mullarkey, 2006: 7; original emphases) Besides a horizontal approach to nature and culture, this monism translates into 'a focus on how immanence relates to change' (Mullarkey, 2006: 8).
Gadamer (2004[1989]: 277) explicitly stated that the Enlightenment attempt at undoing prejudice from research installs itself a prejudice, stemming mainly from his insight that ' [t]o be historically means that knowledge of oneself can never be complete' (ibid.: 301; original emphases).
(Mullarkey, 2006 : 7; original emphases) … the question of ontological monism: if there is nothing 'beyond' the world, no ' arrière monde', then there can be no duality, no two-worlds view.
