Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
A precise origin statement is a marketing instrument.
For consumers, it is important that the origin statement would be truthful.
COOL of the main ingredient can reduce the "imperfect information" of consumers if the origin statement is truthful and accurate.
Among the member states of the European Union, the UK has also made many noteworthy initiatives related to the ingredient origin statement.
The answer may depend on the general legal environment of the country where commercial fraud related to food origin statement occurs.
In the third round: COOL of the main ingredient should be mandatory for the foods that could be subject to fraudulent practices on the origin statement.
What would be the potential impact of the main ingredient origin statement on international trade flows and production systems in various countries?
In the third round, we deepened the discussion by proposing a general regulatory principle for the formulation of a policy on ingredient origin statement: COOL of the main ingredient is usually made on a voluntary basis but should be mandatory for the foods that could be subject to fraudulent practices on the origin statement.
However, mandatory COOL on main ingredient itself can provide only information to consumers, so a mandatory traceability system should be enforced for resolving the problem of commercial fraud related to the origin statement.
It is necessary to study this topic more in-depth: If mandatory COOL of main ingredients is applied to food that is subject to fraudulent practices on the origin statement, will the deceptive practices decrease?
However, an authenticated photocopy of the certificate of origin of the main ingredient issued by country A cannot guarantee that the origin statement on the label would be truthful, and importing country C might need another method to verify the origin if it would damage consumers' interests.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com