Sentence examples for orientation targets from inspiring English sources

The N2pc component was indeed observed for motion targets as well as color and orientation targets, consistent with the use of a common attentional mechanism across feature types.

Furthermore, error rates were overall higher for color than for orientation targets (5.6% vs. 3.6%), F 1,11) = 27.3, p<.0003, with the effect of the feature contrast manipulation being more pronounced for the color than for orientation: F 2,22) = 3.8, p<.04.

Furthermore, RTs were overall faster for orientation (353 ms) than for color (359 ms): F 1,11) = 7.4, p<.02, and the effect of saliency was more pronounced for color than for orientation targets (two-way interaction): F 2,22) = 7.4, p<.004.

Target-distracter similarity was parametrically manipulated using three different feature-contrast levels for color (high: CIE.595,.3323 23; intermediate: CIE.555,.367, 23; low: CIE.540,.388, 23) and orientation targets (high: 33.5°; intermediate: 58°, low: 67° tilt to the vertical), all with equal probability.

The present results demonstrate that single-pulse TMS administered at a sub-threshold intensity to the occipital pole contralateral to the stimulus can facilitate the visual processing both for orientation targets (at the time windows of 200 and 150 ms prior to the stimulus onset) and for luminance cues at the time window of 150 ms prior to the stimulus onset.

In a similar fashion, the control scFv (VH VL orientation) targeting the human CEA was fused at the C-terminus of mouse SA.

Solving the IK problem tells you how much you have to rotate each joint in an articulated chain so that the end of the chain (effector on Fig. 6) reaches a required position and orientation (target on Fig. 6).

An orientation target was presented in one of two peripheral placeholders.

If search for an orthogonal (double) orientation target among single-orientation distractors is faster than search for a single-orientation target among double-orientation distractors, this could explain the search asymmetry observed in Experiment 1.

We observed no search asymmetry between searching for double-orientation targets among single-orientation distractors and vice versa (Fig.  3).

Before we propose an answer to this question, we return to the search based on fused elements, which was tested in Experiment 2. Search for orthogonal targets among single-orientation distractors (mimicking search based on fused elements) was not faster than search for single-orientation targets among orthogonal distractors.