First, the assumption of that both the terms (1) and (5) can reach maxima simultaneously at the same orientation of target module may not be valid in many cases.
For such strategy, graphical view of CRISPRdirect results which visualizes the position and orientation of target sites (Fig. 1C) would be helpful for selecting paired gRNAs.
Thus, the behaviour observed in the study was consistent with the combination of pictorial cues, orientation of the observer relative to the physical vertical, and orientation of target motion relative to the physical vertical.
where k ν and ϕ μ are the frequency and orientation of targeted texture.
Targets appeared with equal probability (.50) in the left and right hemi-field and orientation of targets varied randomly with a proportion of.50 within each cueing condition and spatial hemi-field.
The reaction time data (see Figure 5) showed a main effect of target-decoy separation, F 1,12) = 32.40, p<0.05, ηp2 = 0.73, indicating that participants were faster to respond to the orientation of the target when the target and decoy were far apart compared to when they were near each other.
The error rate data (see Figure 5) showed a main effect of target-decoy separation, F 1,12) = 9.94, p<0.05, ηp2 = 0.45, indicating that participants were more accurate in responding to the orientation of the target when the target and decoy were far apart compared to when they were near each other.
Mental rotation (Mr): the task is to mach the actual spatial orientation of a target object to one out of four different spatial orientations.
In this value-driven attentional capture paradigm, participants respond to the orientation of a target line presented within a shape singleton target (e.g., a colored diamond, surrounded by colored distractor circles).
When the orientation of the target bar was included in this ensemble average (six flanker bars plus target), there continued to be no difference in observers' use of the ensemble orientation in the UVF and LVF, F 1, 3) = 0.37, n.s.s
However, this structure showed a large gap between the E2 active site and the substrate peptide, and with no information on the spatial orientation of the target protein with respect to this peptide, it remained unclear how ubiquitin is transferred to the target.
