And other options do exist: funding from other organizations for evolution-related research has increased, especially for the genomics approaches (large-scale DNA sequencing and bioinformatics) that underpin molecular evolution research.
At the same time, that technology creates possibilities for organizations; organizational evolution almost always lags the structural capabilities of its technological underpinnings.
For some organizations, this evolution is simply the next step in a journey towards flatness that began many years ago.
The lists of scientific and educational organizations cited by the KDE, by the way, are apparently taken from Voices for Evolution (Sager 2008), the National Center for Science Education?s collection of organizational statements in support of teaching evolution.
Many statements from religious denominations and organizations that attest to this are helpfully compiled in the National Center for Science Education's book Voices for Evolution (Sager 2008).
Which leaves plenty of room for evolution.
Yes, the evidence for evolution is irrefutable.
That variation is the grist for evolution.
It's design for evolution.
So much for evolution, NIKE.
So what's next for evolution deniers?
