Sentence examples for organizations challenge from inspiring English sources

Governments, industry, and funding organizations challenge universities to become more "entrepreneurial", often in the context of increasing the commercialization outcomes of publicly funded research.

The role of data collected and incorporated on the fly, in a way that is transparent for the user [20] appears as critical in a context where the volume of interactions between customers and organizations challenge their capacities of adopting scalable customer service models, and embed connection on online channels as part of their case handling.

The value of third-party evaluations, is reflected in the following excerpt from Gap's 2009 website: External organizations challenge us with different goals, identify new or different ways in which we can enhance our program, and hold us accountable for results ("External Evaluations," n.d., para.1).

Going forward, this can establish a precedent as organizations challenge discriminatory laws in court, and offer protection against discrimination in places such as the workforce.

The award, "recognizes visionary ideas for building high- projects that through the novel novel use of technology, materials, programs, aesthetics, and spatial organizations, challenge the way we understand vertical architecture and its relationship with the natural and built environments".

As typically happens when countries or international organizations challenge the status quo, the parties in this controversy framed their positions by using international law.

And are some of those community organizations challenged?

Seven states and two family-planning organizations challenged the rule in lawsuits filed last week in Connecticut.

The two reports were released on Thursday after Israeli news organizations challenged a court order banning reporting on the case.

The American Civil Liberties Union represents a host of media, labor and human rights organizations challenging a statute authorizing the dragnet wiretapping of Americans' international communications.

Five media organizations challenged the order, arguing that it violated the first amendment by excessively restricting public access to judicial proceedings.