organization to change

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "organization to change" is not correct and lacks clarity in written English.
It may be intended to refer to an organization that is undergoing change or is focused on facilitating change, but as it stands, it is ambiguous. Example: "The organization to change its policies has been established to address community concerns."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

29 human-written examples

What are the forces compelling your organization to change?

Harvard Business Review

But reports of such casualties persuaded the organization to change its stand, he said.

The New York Times

In my experience, culture is the hardest part of the organization to change.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

This may require an organization to change the way it does business, designs product and manages supply chain.

Journal of Cleaner Production

It has required getting groups across the organization to change and scale a critical piece of our infrastructure.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The Clinton administration introduced a sweeping new proposal today at the World Trade Organization to change the way governments subsidize farmers, challenging the European Union's extensive agricultural subsidies.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

31 human-written examples

A24 The terror attacks force media organizations to change plans.

The New York Times

It began by lobbying all-white sports organizations to change voluntarily, but made no progress.

The New York Times

As an interim step, Mr. Paulson proposed allowing those organizations to change their rules without seeking explicit approval from regulators.

The New York Times

It's standard practice for news organizations to change breaking news stories as more information comes in.

The New York Times

We also used the evaluation to break through the natural reluctance in organizations to change the physical environment.

Harvard Business Review

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to an organization involved in transformation, use phrases like "organization for change" or "organization focused on change" for improved clarity and idiomatic correctness.

Common error

Avoid using "organization to change" repeatedly in your writing, as it can sound awkward and non-native. Vary your phrasing by incorporating alternatives such as "organization for change", "organization focused on change", or "organization driving change" to improve readability and stylistic flow.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "organization to change" functions as a noun phrase followed by an infinitive, intending to describe an entity with the purpose or capability of implementing changes. However, Ludwig AI indicates that this construction is not grammatically sound and lacks clarity.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Academia

30%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "organization to change" appears in various sources, it is not considered grammatically ideal. Ludwig AI identifies it as lacking clarity, and more idiomatic alternatives like "organization for change" or "organization focused on change" are generally preferred. The phrase is most commonly found in news, scientific, and academic contexts, but writers should exercise caution and prioritize clearer phrasing. Using alternatives can improve the readability and overall quality of writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

organization for change

This alternative uses "for" to indicate the organization's purpose is to promote change.

organization focused on change

This alternative uses "focused on" to emphasize the organization's dedication to change.

organization driving change

This alternative uses "driving" to highlight the organization's active role in initiating change.

organization that changes

This alternative uses a relative clause to describe an organization's capacity for change.

organization undergoing change

This alternative highlights that the organization is currently experiencing a transformation.

organization adapting to change

This alternative focuses on the organization's ability to adjust to new circumstances.

organization embracing change

This alternative emphasizes the organization's positive attitude towards change.

organization committed to change

This alternative highlights that the organization is dedicated to transformation.

organization enabling change

This alternative focuses on the organization's capacity to empower change.

organization managing change

This alternative emphasizes the organization's ability to handle transformation.

FAQs

What's a more grammatically sound way to say "organization to change"?

Alternatives like "organization for change", "organization focused on change", or "organization driving change" are grammatically stronger and more common.

Is "organization to change" grammatically correct?

While the phrase "organization to change" appears in some publications, it's not considered standard English. It's better to use more idiomatic alternatives.

How can I use "organization to change" in a sentence?

While not recommended, you might see it used as: "The Clinton administration introduced a sweeping new proposal today at the World Trade Organization to change the way governments subsidize farmers". A better phrasing would be: "The Clinton administration introduced a sweeping new proposal today at the World Trade Organization for changing the way governments subsidize farmers".

What is the difference between "organization to change" and "organization for change"?

"Organization to change" is not idiomatic and sounds awkward, whereas "organization for change" is grammatically correct and indicates the purpose of the organization.