Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
organisations that
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "organisations that" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to specific organizations that meet certain criteria or perform particular actions. Example: "There are many organisations that focus on environmental conservation and sustainability."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(7)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Terrorist finance sustains organisations that spread death and fear.
Academia
But that still leaves many more organisations that aren't".
News & Media
But they're also funding organisations that aren't [performing well].
News & Media
In other words, partner with organisations that match your scale.
News & Media
They want to work with organisations that stand for something".
News & Media
"Obviously, this makes German organisations that much slower.
News & Media
Does it work with partner organisations that might interest you?
News & Media
Organisations that have higher workloads and lean workforces erode wellbeing.
News & Media
We created innovative partnerships with locally based organisations that implement programmes in developing countries.
Science
SMEs hence establish partnerships with international organisations that can support them in overcoming technological challenges.
Science
The organisations that many people are citing in this debate are organisations that have been wrong in the past and I think they are wrong now.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "organisations that" when referring to a diverse range of entities, including companies, non-profits, and governmental bodies.
Common error
Avoid vague descriptions after "organisations that". Ensure the qualifying clause is specific and measurable to clearly identify the intended group.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "organisations that" functions as a relative clause introducing information that further defines or specifies the noun it modifies (organisations). This phrase is used to narrow down a broader category of entities to a specific subset based on certain characteristics or actions.
Frequent in
News & Media
53%
Science
24%
Formal & Business
8%
Less common in
Wiki
7%
Academia
5%
Reference
3%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "organisations that" is a frequently used and grammatically correct phrase functioning as a relative clause to specify a subset of organizations based on certain attributes or actions. It's employed across various contexts, including news, science, and formal business settings, making it versatile for diverse communication needs. According to Ludwig's AI analysis, the phrase is commonly used and follows standard grammar rules. When using this phrase, ensure that the qualifying clause is specific and measurable to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives such as "groups that" or "entities that" can be used depending on the context. Overall, the phrase serves to categorize and pinpoint specific organizations, contributing to clear and informative writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
groups that
Replaces "organisations" with "groups", a more general term.
entities that
Substitutes "organisations" with "entities", implying a formal or legal context.
institutions that
Replaces "organisations" with "institutions", suggesting established and often public bodies.
companies that
Specifies "organisations" as commercial enterprises.
agencies that
Refers to "organisations" with a specific function or mandate.
businesses that
Similar to "companies that", but may include smaller enterprises.
nonprofits that
Focuses on "organisations" with a non-profit status.
charities that
Highlights "organisations" involved in charitable activities.
establishments that
Replaces "organisations" with "establishments", indicating a formal or business context.
outfits that
Offers a more informal alternative to "organisations".
FAQs
How to use "organisations that" in a sentence?
Use "organisations that" to specify a subset of organizations based on a shared attribute or action. For instance, "organisations that prioritize employee wellbeing often see higher productivity".
What can I say instead of "organisations that"?
Alternatives include "groups that", "entities that", or "institutions that" depending on the specific context and the nature of the organizations you're referring to.
Which is correct, "organisations that" or "organisations which"?
While both "organisations that" and "organisations which" can be grammatically correct, "organisations that" is generally preferred in restrictive clauses, which are essential for identifying the specific organizations being discussed. "Organisations which" is more common in non-restrictive clauses, providing additional information but not essential for identification.
What's the difference between "organisations that" and "organisations who"?
"Organisations that" is generally preferred because it treats organisations as non-personal entities. "Organisations who" can be used, but it's less common and might imply a focus on the people within the organizations rather than the organizations themselves.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested