Sentence examples for ordinary conflict from inspiring English sources

Schools must understand that bullying is not an ordinary conflict between kids; it is an assault on the targeted child.

But for the policy of the forum state, doubtless the foreign law would be given effect under ordinary conflict of laws principles.

It precludes a challenge to the validity of foreign law on the ordinary conflict of laws ground of repugnancy to the public policy of the forum.

Instead, the president wants to fight on territory more directly linked to American interests: the notion that once weapons of mass destruction are used in ordinary conflict, the potential for disaster — for America, and certainly for its allies and partners on Syria's borders — rises dramatically.

Yet the play is really about the ordinary conflicts of couples, abandonment, fear and emerging flashes of decency and courage.

But housing officials say that lately they are noticing something different: students seem to lack the will, and skill, to address these ordinary conflicts.

In a Thursday letter to the lawyers for the numerous parties in the case, the court's clerk, Scott Harris, said that Breyer's wife sold 750 shares of Johnson Controls Inc. -- owner of EnergyConnect Inc., a party in the case -- that same day, noting that the "ordinary conflict-check" the justice's staff conducts ahead of considering a case "inadvertently failed to find this potential conflict".

Ordinary conflicts are thus parts of and transcended by issues far greater than the mundane.

"The purported benefits of this law are not worth the potential for accidents, suicides, escalating ordinary conflicts to deadly levels, or the brain drain of teachers who are either resigning or withdrawing their applications to the university," she said.

He maintained a careful balance among them and largely left the execution of policy to his appointees, thereby placing himself as arbiter above the storm of ordinary political conflict.

Supporters of same-sex marriage have worked very hard to frame their issue, not as an ordinary political conflict, but as an all-or-nothing question that pits enlightenment and progress against reaction, bigotry and hate.