ordered to have

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "ordered to have" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where someone is instructed or mandated to possess or obtain something. Example: "The committee was ordered to have the report completed by the end of the week."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

38 human-written examples

McElroy was ordered to have an evaluation for a concussion.

The New York Times - Sports

She was also ordered to have two years of supervised release after her prison term.

The New York Times - Sports

Mr. Skakel was ordered to have no contact with the Moxley family.

The New York Times

He was ordered to have a meal ready on his first overnight duty -- or else.

The New York Times

He also was ordered to have no "uninvited contact with his girlfriend.

The New York Times - Sports

She's been ordered to have her photo taken with a black or brown person.

The Guardian - Books

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

22 human-written examples

Thirdly, some items were re-ordered to have similar questions grouped together (e.g. SCNS-SF34, item 17 moved after 13) to make it easier for patients to express their needs in this domain.

BMC Cancer

"In order to have the truth prevail".

The New Yorker

We have to protect them in order to have them".

The New Yorker

"In order to have jobs, you have to chase them.

The Guardian

People are not in therapy in order to have fun.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "ordered to have", ensure the context clearly establishes who is giving the order and who is receiving it to avoid ambiguity. For instance, clarify whether the order comes from a court, a superior, or another authority.

Common error

Avoid using "ordered to have" in situations where a suggestion or recommendation is more appropriate. This phrase implies a mandatory directive, not a friendly piece of advice.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "ordered to have" functions as a directive, indicating that someone is under an obligation or command to possess, experience, or obtain something. As Ludwig AI corroborates, this phrase conveys a formal instruction.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Academia

20%

Science

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Wiki

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "ordered to have" is a common and grammatically sound construction used to indicate a formal instruction or legal requirement. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. Predominantly found in News & Media and Academia, it conveys authority and obligation. While versatile, it should not be used in contexts that require softer language like suggestions. Alternative phrases, such as "instructed to possess" or "mandated to obtain", offer nuanced ways to express similar ideas, but the core meaning of a compulsory directive remains central to "ordered to have".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

instructed to possess

Focuses on the act of giving instruction, subtly shifting away from a formal command.

mandated to obtain

Emphasizes the legal or official requirement to acquire something.

required to undergo

Shifts the focus to experiencing a process or procedure, rather than possessing a physical item.

directed to receive

Highlights the reception of something, implying a more passive role compared to actively having or obtaining.

compelled to experience

Emphasizes the force or pressure causing someone to undergo a particular experience.

enjoined to maintain

Focuses on the legal or formal obligation to keep or preserve something.

decreed to own

Conveys a sense of official pronouncement or ruling related to ownership.

commanded to secure

Emphasizes the act of obtaining or ensuring something, often with a sense of urgency or importance.

stipulated to include

Highlights a specific condition or requirement that must be incorporated.

designated to hold

Focuses on being appointed or assigned to possess something.

FAQs

How do I use "ordered to have" in a sentence?

Use "ordered to have" when someone is formally instructed or mandated to possess something or undergo a specific action. For example, "The defendant was ordered to have no contact with the victim."

What can I say instead of "ordered to have"?

You can use alternatives like "instructed to possess", "mandated to obtain", or "required to undergo", depending on the context.

Is it better to say "ordered to have" or "required to have"?

Both "ordered to have" and "required to have" are grammatically correct, but they carry slightly different connotations. "Ordered to have" suggests a direct command from an authority, while "required to have" implies a necessity or condition that must be met. The best choice depends on the specific context.

What is the difference between "ordered to have" and "asked to have"?

"Ordered to have" indicates a command or legal requirement, while "asked to have" implies a request. The former carries the weight of authority, whereas the latter is a polite solicitation.