Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
ordered by decreasing relevance
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "ordered by decreasing relevance" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing the arrangement of items or information based on their importance, with the most relevant first and the least relevant last. Example: "The search results were ordered by decreasing relevance, ensuring that the most pertinent articles appeared at the top of the list."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Stanford University
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
Table 2 displays the ranks of DosR genes by decreasing relevance and decreasing motif scores.
Science
The table is ordered by decreasing average performance.
Academia
The individual studies are ordered by decreasing sensitivity.
Loci ordered by decreasing effect size (odds ratio (OR)).
Genes ordered by decreasing ratio of FGF PDGF expression.
Science
They have been used previously to rank textual documents in order of decreasing relevance to a user-defined query.
Science
The list of results should be sorted so that the most plausible result is first, and the remaining possibilities in order of decreasing relevance.
Science
By repeating the same query for all experiments, we obtain a ranked list that is ordered by the relevance of each experiment to that query.
Science
Most researchers prefer search results to be ordered by relevance rather than any personal connections.
News & Media
PulseRank Search Results – a feed of search results ordered by relevance using OneRiot's PulseRank algorithm, PageRank for the realtime web.
News & Media
The final product of this step is a list of path patterns, ordered by relevance and separated by domain.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "ordered by decreasing relevance" when you want to clearly indicate that a list or set of items is arranged from the most important or pertinent to the least.
Common error
Avoid using "ordered by decreasing relevance" when a simple alphabetical or chronological order is more appropriate, as it implies a specific assessment of importance that may not exist.
Source & Trust
76%
Authority and reliability
4.2/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "ordered by decreasing relevance" functions as a descriptive term that specifies how a set of items is organized. According to Ludwig AI, this expression is valid in written English and indicates items arranged from most to least relevant.
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "ordered by decreasing relevance" is a grammatically correct and usable expression in English, indicating that items are arranged from most to least relevant. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. While examples are currently missing, analysis indicates its suitability for formal and scientific contexts, alongside news and general media. Alternatives like "ranked by diminishing relevance" or "sorted by descending relevance" offer similar meanings. In summary, the phrase is a clear and effective way to describe an arrangement based on importance.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
arranged in descending order of relevance
Slightly rephrases the original, adding more emphasis with "descending order".
ranked by diminishing relevance
Replaces "ordered" with "ranked" and "decreasing" with "diminishing", maintaining the same core meaning.
sorted by descending relevance
Substitutes "ordered" with "sorted" and "decreasing" with "descending", keeping the overall meaning intact.
listed from most to least relevant
Offers a more explicit description of the ordering process.
ranked according to relevance
Focuses on relevance as the primary ranking criterion.
arranged by importance
Focuses on the general concept of importance rather than the specific direction of ordering.
prioritized by relevance
Emphasizes the prioritization aspect of relevance, rather than a strict ordering.
grouped by relevance, highest first
Highlights the grouping aspect, with the most relevant items appearing at the beginning.
organized by relevance level
Uses "relevance level" to describe the organization criteria.
ordered by significance
Switches "relevance" for "significance" implying something's relevance is what makes it significant.
FAQs
What does "ordered by decreasing relevance" mean?
It means items are arranged starting with the most relevant or important and ending with the least relevant.
How can I use "ordered by decreasing relevance" in a sentence?
You might say, "The search results were "sorted by descending relevance" to help users find the most useful information quickly."
What is a good alternative to "ordered by decreasing relevance"?
Alternatives include "ranked by diminishing relevance", "prioritized by relevance", or "arranged by importance" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is "ordered by decreasing relevance" formal or informal language?
"Ordered by decreasing relevance" is suitable for both formal and informal contexts, but more formal alternatives like "arranged in descending order of relevance" may be preferred in highly academic or professional settings.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
76%
Authority and reliability
4.2/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested