Figure 2 presents a systematic ordering of the analyses performed in the current study.
However, attention should be paid to the order of the different analyses so that the techniques less disposed to modify the sample are applied first.
SLPs who were blind to the pre/post order of the videotapes analysed the samples.
We next outline the order of our analyses in the Results section.
In order to test the validity of the analyses additional radii of 0.5 km, 1 km, and 1.5 km around each village were used.
No significant first-order or second-order interactions were noted in any of the analyses.
EB, RK and DMD (in order of contribution) analysed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript.
The different stages of infection and progression in Arabidopsis is shown in Figure 2 in order to better understand the analyses of each of these steps presented below.
Moreover, as this study is a retrospective database study, the ordering of analyses is not influenced by the study.
The main finding of this study was that the ordering of P-Ca analyses was influenced by factors both at the physician and at the HCC level, with the physician level being more important than the HCC level.
