Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(5)
The convergence order of method is O(τ+h4).
Substituting the above approximations (3.36a) and (3.36b) into (3.12), the order of method (3.12) is retained, and hence we obtain the required numerical method of (O k^{2} + k^{2}h^{2} + h^{4})) based on spline in compression approximations (see [37 45]) for differential equation (1.1).
Statistical analysis: significant results are indicated in order of method compared.
We employed a pipeline modeling strategy that benefits from the unique strengths of two distinct modeling methods, and show that the order of method in the pipeline does not have a big impact on outcome.
(rank these in order of method most likely to make false statements – if you feel equally about 2 or more of the methods – please indicate this in the comments) I'm more likely to make false statements about sensitive medical information: Comments/Why 1. over the internet 2. in a telephone interview 3. in a written questionnaire 4. in a personal interview 14.
Similar(55)
The order of methods in the computation of the ring system layout is chosen accordingly to the quality of the resulting coordinates.
However, when used in combination (regardless of the order of methods), the second method was unsuccessful in adding many new aqueous pathways in the stratum corneum, as it acted preferentially near the sites of the existing ones.
These proportions were similar regardless of the order of methods, with the exception that no woman who took ACASI after FtF believed that ACASI would provide less honest answers (data not shown).
Major goals are standardization of diagnostic workflow, hierarchical order of methods, and combination of single results.
We discuss error propagation for general linear methods for ordinary differential equations up to terms of order p+2, where p is the order of the method.
Clearly, it implies that the convergence order of the method is (mathcal{O} tau^{4} + h ^{4})).
More suggestions(4)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com