Sentence examples for order of level from inspiring English sources

In order of level of contribution, defined by the population attributable prevalence fraction, the strongest independent influences upon disability were arthritis, anaemia, limb impairments, dementia, depression, intestinal problems and stroke (Table 9).

The results of the internal and external evaluations were then combined and are shown in Table 1, according to the program levels and indicators (in descending order of level of evidence) adapted from Suvedi and Morford (2003) [ 18] and according to each Phase of the study in which they occurred.

The performance of each categorization case was measured in terms of 1) overall model fit; 2) the statistical significance of individual coefficients; and 3) the consistency of coefficients with the order of levels of precursors (i.e. it is expected that "high" levels of precursors contribute more to crash risk than "low" level precursors).

Because of the significant interaction effect, the characteristics of main effects and interaction effects were checked graphically with reference to the classification of Leigh and Kinnear (1980): the rank order of levels of the factor "goal elaboration and definition" does not remain constant over all levels of the factor "vocational experience".

This hierarchy of modular levels does not necessarily mean the assembly process must proceed sequentially in the order of levels, with the construction of one stage being completed before the next stage begins.

We evaluated each questionnaire item with a score of 1 to 3 points in order of levels of daily PA and then added up the scores to determine the NEAT score.

However, it was felt that it would be too lengthy a process to ask a child to rank the order of levels for each of the 11 possible items in the draft questionnaire.

Firstly, the results of the ranking data analysis were used to determine both the number of levels and order of the levels for the items.

Research validating the hierarchical nature of Bloom's taxonomy is somewhat mixed, with clear support for the ordering of levels 1 4, while the ordering of levels 5 and 6 is less straightforward, in part because there are few questions written at this level (Kreitzer and Madaus, 1994; Anderson and Krathwohl, 2001).

Finally, the data were tested for non-satiation by identifying respondents who chose dominated scenarios, i.e., scenarios in which all attributes with a clear ordering of levels were worse than the competing scenario.

The results presented are categorized into ten different levels arranged in an increasing order of risk level, each of which represents 10%% coverage of the total buffered area.