order of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "order of" is an acceptable and commonly used phrase in written English usage.
It is typically used to refer to the order something is arranged in, either chronologically or hierarchically. For example, "The order of the speakers was determined according to seniority."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

By order of Maj.

The New York Times

Order of the day.

The Guardian

An order of steamers.

The New Yorker

It's the order of buildings.

The New Yorker

First order of business: bathrooms.

The New Yorker

The new natural order of things, perhaps.

The Economist

This is the order of things.

Independent

But A.I.G. was another order of magnitude.

The New Yorker

* The order of the states matters.

The New York Times

Pragmatism is the order of the day.

The Economist

There is a clear order of operations.

The New York Times - Magazine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing a specific sequence or arrangement, ensure that the context clearly indicates whether you are referring to a chronological, hierarchical, or logical "order of" things.

Common error

Avoid ambiguity by explicitly stating what type of "order of" you are referring to, especially when discussing complex processes or systems. For instance, clarify whether it's the "order of" importance, the "order of" operations, or the "order of" events.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "order of" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase, often introducing a noun or noun phrase to specify a sequence, arrangement, or hierarchy. Ludwig AI confirms its widespread and grammatically sound usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

25%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "order of" is a versatile and frequently used prepositional phrase that indicates a sequence, arrangement, or hierarchy. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically sound and appears across various contexts, from news and media to scientific publications. While alternatives like "sequence of" and "arrangement of" exist, "order of" maintains its broad applicability. Understanding the specific context is key to interpreting its intended meaning, and specifying the type of "order of" can further enhance clarity. Whether discussing the "order of" planets or the "order of" operations, this phrase provides a valuable tool for structuring information.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

sequence of

Replaces "order" with "sequence", emphasizing the arrangement in a particular series.

arrangement of

Substitutes "order" with "arrangement", highlighting the way things are organized.

ranking of

Highlights a hierarchical structure or a specific position in a list.

structure of

Emphasizes the internal organization or framework of something.

system of

Replaces "order" with "system", focusing on the structured organization.

succession of

Focuses on the sequence in which things follow one another.

decree of

Emphasizes the authoritative command or instruction, shifting from arrangement to command.

pattern of

Indicates a recognizable arrangement or design.

command of

Similar to "decree", but focuses on direct instructions or control.

form of

Highlights the particular way in which something exists or appears.

FAQs

How can I use "order of" in a sentence?

You can use "order of" to describe the sequence or arrangement of items, events, or steps in a process. For example, "The "order of" the planets from the sun is Mercury, Venus, Earth..." or "The "order of" operations in math is Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division, Addition and Subtraction."

What are some alternatives to the phrase "order of"?

Alternatives include "sequence of", "arrangement of", or "system of", depending on the context. Each alternative emphasizes slightly different aspects of arrangement or organization.

Is it always necessary to specify the type of "order of" being discussed?

While not always necessary, specifying the type of "order of" (e.g., chronological "order of", alphabetical "order of", "order of" importance) can enhance clarity, especially when the context may be ambiguous.

How does the meaning of "order of" change in different contexts?

The meaning shifts based on context. It can refer to a sequential listing, as in "the "order of" events", a hierarchical arrangement, as in "the "order of" command", or a logical progression, as in "the "order of" operations". Understanding the context is crucial for proper interpretation.