Sentence examples for order knowledge from inspiring English sources

Without actively promoting rational order, knowledge alone does not lead to happiness.

In multi-pass decoding, an LM trained with higher order knowledge sources is used to re-score the lattice generated by an LM trained with simpler or lower order knowledge sources from the preceding pass.

Although AND/OR graphs are a powerful formalism for building knowledge structures, we will give preference to a somewhat simpler variant called a partial order knowledge structure (POKS).

To order knowledge systematically, for Kant, means to subsume or unify it under fewer and fewer principles in light of the idea of one "whole of knowledge" so that its parts are exhibited in their necessary connections (cf. 646/B674).

We conclude this section on domain models by stating our next principle: Partial Order Knowledge Structures (POKS) or Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAG) are optimal for formally representing knowledge domains.

At its heart is a recognition of five foci or nodes of change vital to the process (changes in problem and solution formulation, method, constraints, and partial solution proposals) together with a bootstrap marked by the formation of higher order knowledge about problem solving in the domain in tandem with the solving of specific problems, the essential feature of all learned improvement.

The suggested learning concepts are inferred in the following order: similar knowledge, prerequisite knowledge, core knowledge, and then, related knowledge.

It begins with Carl Linnaeus (1707-78), the father of modern natural history, who first ordered knowledge of the natural world.

The difference is that whereas the best soldiers do not question orders, knowledge workers are valued most for their ability to think for themselves.

In the case of the epistemic paradoxes, a similar stratification could be obtained by making an explicit distinction between first-order knowledge (knowledge about the external world), second-order knowledge (knowledge about first-order knowledge), third-order knowledge (knowledge about second-order knowledge), and so on.

For example, in some situations, first-order knowledge of other agents' personal thresholds is not sufficient to motivate an agent to take action, whereas higher-order knowledge or, in the limit, common knowledge is.