The phrase "order consequences" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English
It may be intended to refer to the results or effects of an order, but the phrasing is awkward.
Example: "The order consequences of his actions were severe, leading to significant repercussions."
Alternatives: "resulting consequences" or "consequences of the order."
In these two cases and others, our foreign policy establishment misunderstood the conditions on the ground, exhibited extreme hubris, and miscalculated, causing painful second and third order consequences which rage on to this day.
With regard to ID Scan, the Judge said that there was no evidence that the premises had issues with underage entry/sales; that to deploy it at Fabric would adversely affect the length of the queue, with possible public order consequences; and that it would create problems for the significant number of non-UK customers who would not necessarily carry photo ID.
Every first order action has second order consequences.
This is paradoxical, because higher order consequences of CD4+ T-cell helper function for B cells, CTL activity and memory are driven largely by CD154 as well as other CD40-dependent and -independent co-stimulatory interactions, including OX40, 41BB, ICOS and other members of the B7 family [ 1].
Cocaine, particularly in its base form ('crack'), has become one of the drugs of most concern in the Netherlands, being associated with a wide range of medical, psychiatric and social problems for the individual, and with significant public order consequences for society.
In other terms, is the very weak overall covariation between variables of microwear texture and stomach contents the only spurious first order consequence of distinct covariation structures between the two sets of variables from one season to another?
"My eyes are open to the second-order consequences of the financial crisis".
Although higher temperatures are the most obvious and predictable result of increased CO2, other, second-order consequences — rising sea levels, changes in vegetation, loss of snow cover — are likely to be just as significant.
If they want to point to the immediate consequences of the Libyan war as vindication for a "responsibility to protect" doctrine, they need to acknowledge the second-order consequences for people who will never have the benefits of our protection.
Even if you don't believe that a more recovery-centric approach would have much an immediate difference to the unemployment numbers, it would have had significant second-order consequences for American politics.
But the programs and their liabilities do loom rather large in contemporary debates over the size and scope of government, and from a communitarian perspective the second-order consequences that Ponnuru's piece describes would seem to be a telling brief in favor of seeking their reform.
