Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Response options were rated on a five-point Likert-scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (to a very high degree).
The response options were rated on a four-point Likert scale as '3 = strongly agree'2 '2 = agree', '1 = disagree' and '0 = strongly disagree'.
Similar(58)
The items were rated on a five point scale with the rating options 'strongly agree'agreegree'neitherther agree nor disagree'disagreegree' and 'strongly disagree'.
The response options for each item are rated on a 3-point scale as follows: 0 (no symptom), 1 (probable or mild symptom), and 2 (definite, marked symptom).
Standardized answer options are provided and each question is rated on a scale from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is then calculated for each subscale.
Standardized answer options are provided, and each question is rated on a scale from 0 to 4. A score is calculated for each subscale after which raw scores for each subscale are transformed to a scale ranging from 0 to 100 and presented graphically as the FAOS profile.
You're rated on your performance, with the option to move through the difficulty levels as your timing and confidence improves.
It contains eight items that are rated on a four-point scale, with different response options.
A joint question on tiredness/sleepiness was rated on a three point Likert-scale with response options "not true", "somewhat true" and "certainly true".
For N1, N2, N3, N4, N6 and N7, option 2 always falls between the regions of options 1 and option 3, thereby attaining a rating of "Yes" for Criteria 3. Options for N5 were rated as "No" on Criterion 3, as a visual examination of the curve shows that for N5, option 2 does not fall between options 1 and 3, and follows the same pattern as option 3 from the 25th percentile of the expected total score.
And in fact institutional clients have the option of investing in companies such as Shell and BP which score poorly in some categories but are rated highly on management.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com