Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
Optimum power conversion efficiency of 1.49% was obtained in a DSSC with the ZnO nanowires length of 3 μm.
Our experimental results demonstrated that an optimum power conversion efficiency of up to 5.30% can be achieved by the ITO/CuInS2(2)/Al2O3/(cellH3)PbI3/Ag cell.
In particular, the optimum power conversion efficiency of 2.91% is obtained at the ratio of NP/NS = 3 7, and the trend of η is generally consistent with that of Jsc.
The optimum power conversion efficiency was about 1.95% under AM 1.5 G illumination (100 mW cm−2), with a short circuit current density, open circuit voltage, and fill factor of 6.11 mA cm−2, 0.562 V and 0.57, respectively.
The composites of cobalt nitride and mesoporous carbon are superior to the counterparts of cobalt oxide and mesoporous carbon in catalyzing the triiodide reduction, and the dye-sensitized solar cell with the composites achieves an optimum power conversion efficiency of 5.26%, which is comparable to the one based on the conventional Pt counter electrode (4.88%).
Similar(55)
The optimum results show the power conversion efficiency of 17.42%, open-circuit voltage of 0.97 V, current density of 24.06 mA/cm2, and fill factor of 0.747.
Under optimum conditions, the DSSC achieved a remarkable power conversion efficiency of 8.36 % assembled with the NiS/Gr-Ag CE, much higher than that based on the Pt CE (7.76 %).
The results show that the DSSC based on ZnO/TiO2 film with an optimum concentration of ZnO (3 wt%) shows power conversion efficiency of 8.10%, improved by 28% compared to that of pure TiO2 based solar cell.
At an optimum GA film thickness of 4.9 μm, a power conversion efficiency of 96% of that achieved with a Pt counter electrode based DSSC is obtained.
Under optimum conditions, the CdS/CdSe co-sensitized QDSSC demonstrated a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 2.40% under 100 mW/cm2 illumination of simulate sunlight.
The power conversion efficiency of the device at optimum conditions (parametric (D5) and Taguchi (D9)) has been found as 5.59% and 6.51%, respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com