Exact(1)
The Optical vs Electronic debate will rage forever, I'm sure, but in a point and shoot either is welcome.
Similar(59)
When the concentration of AgNP was 50 μg/ml, growth of E. coli was completely inhibited, which indicated that the MIC of AgNP to E. coli was 50 μg/ml (Figure 4). Figure 4 Optical density vs concentration of AgNP.
Camera optical center v c is then computed as follows [8]: v_{c} = 2 f cdot text{tan}(theta_{x} / 2) + v_{0} (4).
To speed up the simulation of collected Class I photons, we developed a novel importance sampling method for Monte Carlo simulations that bias the scattered photon packet direction u ^ ' preferentially towards the apparent position of the center tip of the collecting optical system v ^ once the photon packet reaches the depth range of interest.
The bending of the piezo bimorph can be described by [ 21, 22, 24]: where y is the axial displacement of the piezo, x is the lateral position of the piezo with respect to the optical axis, V is the applied voltage, d31 is the piezoelectric coefficient, and T is the total thickness of the piezo.
It is observed that optical flow components V x and V y are quite sensitive to the shot transition also.
A (v,W,λ,Q) variable-weight optical orthogonal code ((v,W,λ,Q -OOC) is a collection of (0,1) seQ -OOCs wish weights in W, auto- and collectionelatiof parameter λ.
In our study a lower volumetric productivity (0.3 0.7 g L−1 day−1) was obtained than values reported by Zittelli et al. [ 17] because of a larger optical path; 0.05 vs 0.012 m.
Then, the current density distribution at different energies for the mentioned MOSFET structure by considering both acoustic and optical phonon scattering at V DS = 0.3 V and V GS = −0.2 V is shown in Fig. 10.
The true optical flow (u, v) is calculated from the method introduced in Section 2.2.
(v) Optical properties: surface plasmon resonance (SPR) could detect the changes in nanoparticle aggregation states [29].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com