The phrase "opposing ideologies" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe two ideas that are completely different and incompatible with each other. For example: "The conflict between the two countries was rooted in their opposing ideologies."
As is so often the case, insights emerge from the sparks that fly when two opposing ideologies clash.
Amid all the passionate argument, it is easy for misunderstandings and fictions to fill the void between opposing ideologies.
According to Official London Theatre, "as the pair try to rekindle their once passionate relationship, they find themselves locked in a battle of opposing ideologies and mutual desires... .....
The war, it explains, "unfolds between two opposing ideologies," with the Union opposed by a "confederacy of slaveholding states true to their own interpretation of the U.S. Constitution".
Whether the Barenboim-Said initiative has fulfilled its higher mission — to mediate between opposing ideologies — is a matter of intense, sometimes vituperative debate.
The struggles of opposing ideologies, classes and nations unleashed by the French and Industrial Revolutions did not end with the cold war.
Yet, as with so many public health interventions, the sound and fury of opposing ideology often trumps rational analysis.
"Opposing ideology makes strange bedfellows".
A real turning point is only reached when the two stop treating each other as one-dimensional symbols of an opposing ideology.
Creating a dialogue with people who espouse opposing ideology helps us understand not only our position, but forces us to consider, buttress, and defend our own ideals as well.
The ones who secure close ties with the government advance, get away with anything; while those that support an opposing ideology or political doctrine continue to fight a losing battle.
