Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
opposing evidence
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"opposing evidence" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used when discussing a topic or argument that has multiple sides or viewpoints. "Opposing evidence" refers to evidence or information that contradicts or goes against a particular claim or argument. Example: "The defense presented strong evidence that the defendant was not at the scene of the crime, but the prosecution's opposing evidence proved otherwise."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
18 human-written examples
To her credit, she records the opposing evidence.
News & Media
By contrast, the tribunal found him to be an honest witness, while identifying numerous inconsistencies and flaws in the opposing evidence.
News & Media
Whenever he/she believes he/she can do so consistently with safeguarding both the information and its source, the USCIS Director or his or her designee should direct that the applicant or petitioner be given notice of the general nature of the information and an opportunity to offer opposing evidence.
Academia
Generating sets of alternative hypotheses is a core task of any investigation that involves making claims and finding supporting and opposing evidence.
Science
As we saw earlier, a notion of acceptance (as "faith") is the sort of thing that a fideist might want to appeal to against those who say that one can't just decide to believe that p in the face of strong opposing evidence.
Science
Certain brain areas go into overdrive, treating opposing evidence like an existential threat.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
42 human-written examples
Vague set theory is superior to fuzzy set theory in dealing with uncertain and imprecise judgments of decision makers (DMs) due to its ability of supporting opposing evidences.
However, there is opposed evidence against this scenario, which is that silkworm chromosomes 5 and 28 correspond to one chromosome in He. erato and silkworm chromosomes 23 and 27 correspond to another one [ 33].
Science
As Ms. Kelley's group opposed evidence-based prevention methods such as contraception and comprehensive sexuality education, its "abortion reduction" rhetoric is simply a newly packaged antiabortion message.
News & Media
Optimal standards for women friendly care are those that are valued by women, and yet do not oppose evidence-based practice as perceived by health professionals.
Science
Most studies however focused on uptake of research evidence, as opposed to evidence more widely.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When presenting "opposing evidence", ensure you accurately represent the original claim and the evidence against it to avoid misinterpretations.
Common error
Avoid dismissing "opposing evidence" simply because it contradicts your viewpoint. Acknowledge its validity and address it thoughtfully to strengthen your argument.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "opposing evidence" functions as a noun phrase, typically used as the subject or object of a sentence. It identifies evidence that contradicts a particular claim or argument. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is a correct and commonly used phrase.
Frequent in
Science
34%
News & Media
31%
Academia
14%
Less common in
Wiki
11%
Encyclopedias
6%
Formal & Business
4%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "opposing evidence" is a noun phrase used to refer to information that contradicts a specific claim or argument. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used in various contexts. It appears most frequently in science, news media, and academic writing. The phrase serves to introduce, acknowledge, or discuss evidence that challenges a particular viewpoint, promoting a balanced perspective. When using this phrase, ensure accurate representation of both the original claim and the "opposing evidence" to avoid misinterpretations and to strengthen your argument by addressing counterclaims thoughtfully.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
conflicting evidence
Replaces "opposing" with "conflicting", emphasizing the contradictory nature of the evidence.
contradictory evidence
Uses "contradictory" instead of "opposing", highlighting the direct contradiction between pieces of evidence.
evidence to the contrary
A more formal and emphatic way of indicating evidence that disproves something.
counter evidence
A more concise term to indicate evidence that counters a claim.
rebutting evidence
Emphasizes the act of refuting a claim with evidence.
disproving evidence
Highlights the act of proving a claim wrong with evidence.
challenging evidence
Focuses on the evidence's role in challenging an existing claim.
inconsistent evidence
Suggests a lack of alignment or agreement within the body of evidence.
evidence against
Directly indicates evidence that works against a specific argument or position.
adverse evidence
Implies that the evidence is unfavorable or detrimental to a particular stance.
FAQs
How can I effectively present "opposing evidence" in an argument?
Acknowledge the "opposing evidence" fairly, explain its relevance, and then clearly articulate why your argument still holds, or how the "opposing evidence" is limited or flawed.
What is the difference between "conflicting evidence" and "opposing evidence"?
While similar, "opposing evidence" directly counters a specific claim, while "conflicting evidence" simply indicates that different pieces of evidence present contradictory information, without necessarily refuting a central claim.
When is it appropriate to disregard "opposing evidence"?
It's rarely appropriate to completely disregard "opposing evidence". Instead, critically evaluate its source, methodology, and relevance. If it's weak or irrelevant, explain why; otherwise, address it directly.
What are some strategies for finding "opposing evidence" when researching a topic?
Actively seek out sources that challenge your initial assumptions. Use search terms that indicate disagreement or alternative perspectives, and be open to revising your viewpoint based on the "opposing evidence" you find.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested