The phrase "opposer of" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to describe someone who is in opposition or disagreement with someone or something else. Example: The senator was known to be a strong opposer of the new tax bill, citing its potential negative impact on the middle class.
A gr8 parliamentarian, super guy & ferocious opposer of injustice.
Not like he needs the money either, he's loaded!" A strong opposer of digital distribution, Prince famously stated his belief that "the internet is completely over" in 2010.
Pahlavi wrote: "Any attempt to force Mr Khosravi's return to Iran will lead to his incarceration, torture and possible conviction and execution as a political and human rights opposer of the regime".
At best, Stephen O'Smith is a rightful opposer of the EDL's fascist cause, who's found a slightly misguided way of expressing it, given the tensions mounting between the far right and those who oppose them in this country.
Later in that year she crushed what seems to have been a plot by the Iconoclasts (opposers of the use of icons) to put Leo's half brother, Nicephorus, on the throne.
And yet the opposers of the new system in this state, who profess an unlimited admiration for its constitution, are among the most intemperate partizans of a bill of rights.
It is past dispute that the opposers of the constitution were, in sundry instances, treated in a manner utterly inconsistent with that respect which is due to every freeborn citizen of the commonwealth, especially when acting in the capacity of a representative.
That tells me that opposers of marijuana legalization are more worried that someone could be getting high from medical marijuana than they are about people dying from opioid overdoses.
In 1932 he published an interpretation of a passage in Ezekiel describing the attack on Jerusalem by Gog of Magog, in which he predicted an intensification of persecution of Jehovah's Witnesses that would culminate in God intervening on their behalf to begin the battle of Armageddon, which would destroy all opposers of God's organization.
One such opposer, the University of British Columbia's Rosie Redfield, said the article was, in essence, a load of bunk, saying that the article may be a lot of things, but it certainly wasn't science.
One opposer accused the company of "inciting racism" while another argued that the stigma the show will bring to the community will "go on for a generation".
