Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(8)
where are positive operators for each.
By Rockafellar's theorem [25, 26], ∂g i are maximal monotone operators for each i = 1, 2,..., N. Let λ i > 0 for each i = 1, 2,..., N. Then if and only if. which is equivalent to.
Now, let us consider the following Kantorovich-type modification of discreteq-Beta operators for each positive integer n and q ∈ ( 0, 1 ) : V n ∗ ( f ; q ; x ) = [ n + 1 ] q [ n ] q ∑ k = 0 ∞ ( ∫ [ k ] q / [ n + 1 ] q [ k + 1 ] q / [ n + 1 ] q f ( t ) d q t ) p n, k ( q ; x ) q 2 k − 1, (1.6).
A human consensus (HC) classification was also established as the type designated by two or more of the three human operators for each spine.
We introduce polynomial collapsing operators for each subnetwork.
All procedures described above were performed in the same laboratory and situation, by the same operators for each subject at the same time during the day (approximately 3 5 pm).
Similar(52)
and operators ("for all" and "for some").
In 1999, it took one operator for each reactor; today Nanophase is able to have one operator for four reactors.
This implies that A m : B → B is a continuous operator for each natural number m.
Let (A_{i}: H_{1}to H_{2}) be a bounded linear operator for each (i=1,ldots,N_{1}) with (N_{1}inmathbb{N}) and (B_{i}: Cto H_{1}) be a (beta_{i} )-inverse strongly monotone operator for each (i=1,ldots,N_{2}) with (N_{2}inmathbb{N}).
Let (E_{Omega_{i},tau,xi}^{i}) be the extension operator for each (Omega_{i}) constructed by (10).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com