Sentence examples for openly review from inspiring English sources

Many experts on regulations say that if the guidelines are written appropriately, they could spur agencies to carefully, openly review the quality of science used to write rules or set policies in advance.

They include stricter certification and standardized training for fire investigators; more resources for court-appointed lawyers to investigate their clients' cases; greater oversight of forensic labs and forensic methodologies; and clemency boards that are required to carefully and openly review and deliberate on each case.

Healthcare needs a structured, clinician-led, industry-wide process to openly review, identify and mitigate hazards, and share best practices that ultimately improve patient safety.

17 Healthcare could benefit from building upon successful and internally motivated peer-to-peer programs, thereby creating a structured, clinician-led, industry-wide process to openly review, identify and mitigate hazards, and share best practices that ultimately improve patient safety.

We also agree with your point about new/junior reviewers who may feel exposed by openly reviewing someone more senior than them and have acknowledged that in the guidelines.

While the administration has been openly reviewing its tattered athletics program for a year, the decision to drop football caught many people off guard, puzzling some, angering others, while becoming a public relations nightmare.

That said, we would like to substantially increase the number of papers published and openly reviewed in this way, and to do so without compromising the quality of the articles, but rather via diversification of the subjects that are covered in the journal and we hope enhancing the impact of the articles at the same time.

Far from hiding from these statistics, to our knowledge the IAAF is the only sport in the world to have openly reported, reviewed and analysed the statistics available in its long-term blood profiling database".

I thought the President could have saved himself some trouble by communicating more openly about the review while it was going on.

Carry out the review openly, summarising actions at the end of the meeting and tracking them at the following one.

We take your point that perceived impact can indeed sway readers and we certainly agree that as well as the scientific community practicing open science and reviewing openly,  journals and journal editors need to play a role in ensuring that reviewers are doing a job that ensures integrity - we believe they can use the principles of the oath to do this.