Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
The Metaphysics 101 argument can seem Janus-faced: its premises seem utterly shallow, and yet its conclusion seems to resolve a deep ontological debate.
The traditional realism versus nominalism debate is an ontological debate over whether in order to account for properties we need to invoke a class of entity, universals (see Section 1.2 above).
Similar(58)
It does help in ontology, though, if some of the relevant expressions in ontological debates, like the quantifiers themselves, exhibit such different readings.
Deflationary nominalists challenge this deeply held assumption in ontological debates.
Worse, if the criterion is to have application to the actual ontological debates among philosophers, it will have to apply to theories couched within ordinary language as well.
Amie Thomasson has expressed a more measured scepticism about certain art-ontological debates (2004a, 2005, 2006).
The most prominent debate of this kind is the debate about the ontological argument for the existence of God.
(He does not here consider the ontological argument, but in his famous 1948 radio debate with the Jesuit philosopher Frederick Copleston he argues that the concept of a necessarily existent being, which is central to the ontological argument, is nonsensical).
The ontological argument.
Explore the ontological argument more deeply.
First, however, let us review the ontological or metaphysical debate over the self that led to this political conclusion.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com