Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Only that article sucked too.
Similar(59)
(And not only that, but the article actually cites "loathsome buzz" from liberal bloggers as escalating the wave!).
But that article said only that Mr. Ryan "has made close to 40 climbs," not specifying the number of separate peaks.
But that article confirmed only that her cells could make blood, not that they would transform into other tissue types.
She said that good reviews were a form of mentoring, which should help authors not only with that article but with future articles too.
Rather than selecting only the articles that are in one's research area, she advises grazing across several fields.
For the meta-analysis, only articles that published a 2×2 table or included data that allowed the construction of a 2×2 table were included.
Only articles that describe severely displaced dislocation were selected and this largely meant Tossy et al. or Allman Type III and Rockwood et al. Type III dislocation.
Only articles that could be matched with geotagged data were included in their visualization.
Only articles that reported on safety were included.
Only articles that addressed the empirical study of institutional care management were included.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com