Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
No one supposes that Frege said the last word on any topic; but there is scarcely a live question in contemporary philosophy of language for whose examination Frege's views do not form at least the best starting point.
(One supposes that their inability to retain the correct name of the man who made the so-called dirty pictures is a symbol of their righteousness).
One supposes that is a radially symmetric function satisfying.
Moreover, if one supposes that observers and their measuring devices are constructed from simpler systems that each obey the deterministic dynamics, as Everett did, then the composite systems, the observers and their measuring devices, must evolve in a continuous deterministic way, and nothing like the random, discontinuous evolution described by rule 4b can ever occur.
Furthermore, the function (2.3). is a positive continuous function, therefore, has a minimum on, hence one supposes that there exists such that for.
However, no one supposes that our skill on bikes indicates a "bicycling organ".
No one supposes that all definite descriptions are rigid (on all uses: see §2.3.1); as we have seen, 'the brightest non-lunar object in the evening sky' is not rigid.
For example, if one supposes that participants generally sustain attention to an on-screen stimulus until a relevant response is made, activation in brain regions that support attention (e.g., lateral frontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex [13], [14]) should increase approximately linearly with RT, other things being equal [cf. 8].
An example of an instantial term in natural language would be occurrences of 'n' when one supposes that n is an arbitrary prime number and on the basis of subsequently establishing the claim that n is F, one concludes that all prime numbers are F. Or given that some prime number is F, one might let n be "a prime that is F" and go on to establish certain other claims "about" n.
One supposes that the proofreaders tried to be particularly vigilant when working on this book.
One supposes that Valentino is a special case.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com