Rather, our government, captured by the delusion that they are watching free trade and free markets at work, has too often simply stood by and allowed one-sided destruction to go on.
Balancing trade, coupled with rewarding productivity, will move us a long way toward ending both the one-sided destruction of industry by subsidized competition with its consequent loss of jobs, and the growth of our indebtedness to other nations.
How can we maintain that we must possess these weapons of mass destruction while Iran, facing threats from a nuclear-armed Israel on one side and a nuclear-armed Pakistan on the other, must not.
On one side are ecologists, who say the 37% conservation target is simply not enough, paving the way for the destruction of most of the Ghats.
Furthermore, measurements on one side are representative of both sides.
This time out, the guitar-and-drum-machine duo are leaving party politics to one side and tackling the destruction of our natural environment.
Any such policy is based on the promise that if one side launches a nuclear attack, the other side will retaliate with an equally devastating nuclear attack, thus assuring the destruction of both societies and the deaths of millions of innocent civilians.
