One option that advertisers support is supplementing circulation data with new data on readership.
Sometimes (and this has happened to me) applying a formal constraint to a remix of problematic language related to a current event can lead to misunderstandings among one's readership.
Anthony's approach to the periodical is odd - on the one hand its readership is "limited" to an intellectual elite ("academics, writers, commentators"); on the other, he claims that in the past while reading it he actually thought less, as "it was a relief to defer to the better read, the more keenly informed".
One is the readership is much more national and international.
Since most households have more than one reader, total readership is calculated at 32,000.
"The industry saw that there was a new readership," one publishing executive said.
As a Graduate Student Instructor with six semesters of teaching experience and one semester of readership experience at Berkeley, I have already handled several cases of academic dishonesty, including egregious plagiarism, piecemeal plagiarism, unintentional plagiarism, and dual submission of the same essay for two courses without proper notification of the instructors concerned.
(Less charitably, of this readership, one might agree with a scornful Pauline Kael, talking of a mid-60s movie tie-in edition that was not, in fact, a novelisation: "Teenage girls are reading Pasternak's Dr Zhivago to find out more about Omar Sharif …") And that sounds weird, doesn't it?
Could you not have done the drooling, mongoloid contingent of your readership one better and not morally scrape the bottom of the barrel?
Sometimes the words are background noise, sometimes they can feel like being a kid again and simply happy, sometimes they're an excuse for nearly dancing on a railway platform, sometimes I get paid for trying to put them down on paper, sometimes they'll end up in a letter with a readership of one.
