Sentence examples for one reader only from inspiring English sources

Russian texts were evaluated by one reader only, but discussed with the two others to come to a consensus regarding the quality of the paper.

In this case, seven of the nine readers correctly localized the cancer in both sessions, but rated their finding substantially more suspicious in the session with interactive CAD enabled, one reader only located the cancer correctly in the session where CAD was enabled, and one reader did assign a slightly lower rating to the cancer in the session with CAD.

Here is Nabokov with his guard down, writing for only one reader, but the literary guile remains as shrewd and uniquely individual as ever.

For the binary endpoint, with one reader assessment, only in 1 of 5 cases (20%), significance was reached, with two readers in 4 of 10 cases (40%), with three readers in 6 of 10 cases (60%), with four readers in 4 of 5 cases (80%) and with all five readers.

We excluded some that set conditions — one reader offered $20,000 but only on condition that O'Reilly wear body armor no better than that worn by troops in Iraq.

Indeed, the coverage range r is large enough to energize and interrogate the whole area of interest and relaying on only one reader referred to as "illuminator" (Fig. 10).

Today, we are giving away two free tickets (valued at $120 each) to the Crunchies Awards — only one reader will win, but they'll be able to bring a friend, colleague, date, or whomever they choose.

Providing a post publication forum for readers to share knowledge of discrepancies is important, because, as our study shows, one reader may spot only a subset of the discrepancies noticed by multiple readers.

But stay with a clear and concise one if your reader only has a working knowledge of the language.

The Irish Times reports that The Sun's Dublin office received "a few phone calls inquiring about the change, but only one reader is understood to have demanded its return".

Interestingly, when RA and control groups were compared for cartilage damage progression, only one reader found a significant difference between them, while for the other reader there was a statistical trend only (P = 0.06).