Exact(9)
In addition, the brainstem categories of the FOUR score rely on up to three different items (pupil, corneal, and cough reflex) whereas all categories of the GCS rely on one item only.
Where there are missing data for one item only on subscale 2 and/or up to three items missing on the total scale the missing scores can be replaced with means for the remaining items on that subscale/total scale for the purposes of computing the subscale score or total score.
The propagator has only one dressing function D s, so the first list contains one item only: But the gap equation also depends on other dressing functions, namely on the one of the gauge field, D A, and on the two of the scalar-gauge field vertex, D A s s ¯ (1 ) and D A s s ¯ (1 ).
As Factor 3 consisted of one item only, this item was not further used in the analyses.
One item, only found in the checklist by Pope was 'whether the receiving department is notified' and we included this item also in our checklist [ 28].
ONE item only.
Similar(50)
One item applied only to matched studies (item 6b) and another only to cohort studies (item 14c).
Unlike spoken sentence comprehension, any auditory short-term memory load is low (one item) and only the lexical (noun) level of processing is assessed.
If they had, the list would have only been one item long, because only one school in their dataset had students earning less than $30,000100 years after enrolling.
This whole-array procedure is commonly employed (cf. Cowan et al., 2005; Luck & Vogel, 1997; Saults & Cowan, 2007; Vogel, McCullough, & Machizawa, 2005), although it is also common to employ probes with only one item present or with only one item marked as possibly having changed (for a comparison of whole- and partial-report tests, see Wheeler & Treisman, 2002).
Of the 24 studies that identified at least one non-invariant item, only three examined impact on latent mean differences (none on composite mean differences).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com