Suggestions(1)
Exact(53)
At least one abnormality on cardiac MRI was observed in 39/52 patients (75%).
First, the majority (75%) of patients with SSc had at least one abnormality on cardiac MRI which gives a higher sensitivity than echocardiography (48%).
Ross et al. [ 19] reported 180 cases of septic arthritis of the sternoclavicular joint; in accordance with our findings, 85% showed normal plain radiographs and at least one abnormality on CT or MRI, both of which are used to determine the severity of an infection (Fig. 1) [ 2, 13, 20].
All of the twenty normal-weight and overweight participants had normal circadian BP variability, while 8 out of 15 obese participants had at least one or more variety of abnormal circadian BP variability (four participants had one abnormality each, while the other four had two variability abnormalities each) (p < 0.05; Exact Test).
At least one abnormality (swelling, bone destruction or abscess) was found on CT scans.
The main judgement criterion for abnormal microcirculation was the presence of at least one abnormality in capillaroscopy.
Similar(7)
If no abnormalities or one demyelinating abnormality was noted, then the patient was classified as axonal (group A), regardless of the degree of abnormality in the motor and sensory amplitudes.
There was one suprarenal abnormality on the right suspected to be a possible infected adrenal haemorrage.
There was one suprarenal abnormality on the right suspected to be a possible haemorrage (table 3 and figures 1, 2, 3 and 4).
Of 397 patients with at least one echocardiographic abnormality, a questionnaire on management was available.
There were three transfers for APH/PPROM, all classified as PPROM; one APH/fetal abnormality classified as miscellaneous; one APH/PTL classified as PTL; one IUGR/fetal abnormality classified as fetal abnormality; one fetal abnormality/PTL classified as PTL; one PET/APH classified as PET; one PET/IUGR classified as PET; and one PPROM/PTL classified as PTL.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com