Exact(2)
Given that only district-level statistics of disability and access to primary care were available, we assume that CAs within the same district have the same values on the respective items.
Four quadrants are used: harder items not achieved (i.e., under expectation when the responded score is less than the expected value on the respective items), harder items achieved, easier items not achieved, and easier items achieved.
Similar(58)
Two scales were computed based on mean scores of the respective items and were named Knowledge Legislation and General Knowledge.
Both domains are rated on a 10 point scale, and the two domains are reported as composite scores calculated as the average of the respective items [ 21].
The items most often considered importantare presented in Table 2, including information on the source of the respective item (literature vs. expert vs. patient survey), the domain assigned by the investigator and the percentage it was chosen by participants.
Missing data were replaced with the median or mean values of the respective item.
For the remaining two subscales, we computed z-scores for each item, summed the z-scores for the respective items within each subscale and subsequently dichotomized each subscale (based on a median split).
The images are to assist you when looking for the respective item-type.
An approval rating of 100% corresponded to all subjects answering "yes" on the respective item.
Sample characteristics are presented in Table 2 for managerial function separately.> In a first step the confirmatory factor model was estimated with the respective items loading on the theoretically assumed corresponding factor.
From this analysis, it was observed that the items share common latent construct partially, whereas there are low to moderate associations between the subscales and the respective items (based on the factor loadings) with a high variability of the associations within each subscale of both versions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com