During these sessions a variety of user data were captured, including: comprehension (recall, recognition), usability (time on task, accuracy, user satisfaction), and navigation (path length, category node hits).
There were no differences on task accuracy.
Greater TMS interference on task accuracy correlated with reduced changes in motor excitability, suggesting a link between neural activity reflecting early orienting and visual recognition of body expressions.
With increasing time-on-task, accuracy in all groups grew from the first to the third block and then decreased in the fourth block).
When asked this type of moderately difficult mathematics question individuals with ASD, WS and TD showed a benefit of averting their gaze on their task accuracy.
The effect of the subtraction task on the listening task accuracy, Figure 10, is explained by the model: When the subtraction task is hard, there is a high demand for declarative memory, causing the model to not process all words of the listening task (for which declarative memory is also required).
An accuracy score for each participant on each of the 4 days of training was calculated based on their performance on this task, and a repeated-measures ANOVA on these accuracy scores was conducted to investigate the effect of VA training on the recognition task accuracy over the days of training.
Multiple comparisons between conditions found that for the rhyming task, accuracy on O−P− was significantly higher than that on O+P+, O+P−, and O−P+ (t 51) = 2.113, P = 0.04, t 51) = 4.279, P < 0.001, t 51) = 3.999, P < 0.001, respectively).
Finally, as in Experiment 1, performance on the mental rotation task (accuracy, RTs) was unrelated to the musical abilities scores obtained on the full amusia battery and its contour subtest (rs (16) <|.23|), as well as on the pitch detection task (all r (12) <|.16|; four of the matched controls did not participate in the pitch discrimination task).
Individual differences in attachment style did not influence performance on the dot counting task (accuracy and reaction times).
A year later, Pessoa, McKenna, Gutierrez and Ungerleider (2002) found no differential responses in the amygdala to neutral and negative distractors on employing a difficult task (accuracy = 64%%).
