Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(60)
In order to overcome some limitations of the stepwise method, such as variable selection, uncertainty about the variables, and overfitting, and based on our sample size (624 women), we performed a split-sampling internal validation [ 17– 17].
The measurement system used on our sample is repeatable.
A quantitative examination of crack aperture should be done on our sample for further understanding.
10,000 h sealing of the safety valve was realized on our sample machine by our client.
The XML output resulting from running the OSCAR parser on our sample text provides the following:
Rankings are again based on our sample of 138 non landlocked countries corresponding to 9453 country pairs.
Throughout this work, we consistently present only those locations on our sample, which did not include any step-bunching regions.
Our results show that the same set of endohedral sites, as well as the same set of external sites, is available on our sample to all adsorbates investigated.
The fraction of women in our sample is particularly low (25.1%) but it depends on our sample selection which includes mainly blue collars.
Based on our sample size and power calculations, we estimated that each group should have 18 (for ABO-COGS scores) to 20 patients (for cephalometric variables).
As regards the in-out measurements, those taken on our sample showed that the lateral incisors had the smallest values, whereas the molars were the most prominent.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com