Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
NASS reported that an average 1.5 applications of glyphosate were made on HR soybeans in 2005, while Sankula assumes only 1.18 applications.
But in 2002, herbicide use on HR soybeans increased 8.6 million kgs (19 million pounds), driven by a 0.2 kgs/ha (0.18 pounds/acre), increase in the glyphosate rate per crop year, a 21% increase.
Similar(58)
The cultivation of HR soybean, maize, and cotton led to an increased herbicide use in the US by an estimated 239 million kg in 1996 2011, compared to non-HR crops, with HR soybean accounting for 70% of the total increase [72].
Compared to herbicide use rates per hectare on non-HR hectares, HR crops increased herbicide use in the U.S. by an estimated 239 million kgs (527 million pounds) in the 1996 2011 period, with HR soybeans accounting for 70% of the total increase across the three HR crops.
For example in recent years, "other herbicides" have been applied to around one-half of HR soybean hectares at an average rate of ~0.34 kgs/ha (~0.3 pounds/acre), resulting in an average ~0.17 kgs/ha (~0.15 pounds/acre) of "other herbicide" applications on all HR hectares (0.5 × 0.34).
The common Midwestern rotation of HR corn-HR soybeans, or HR soybeans-HR cotton in the South, exposes weed populations to annual and repetitive glyphosate-selection pressure.
However, since then, overall herbicide use in HR crops has increased: From 1998 to 2013, the increase in amounts (kg/ha) of active ingredient (a.i). in HR soybean was 64%, compared to 19% in conventional soybean [71].
HR soybean is the dominant GM crop and grown mainly in North and South America, making up about 80% of the global soybean area and 46% of the total GM crop area [12].
Coordinates HR activities, advises on policies, procedures, and best practices, and collaborates on HR programs for the MIT Press (~110 employees).
However, HR-AUCg is strongly dependent on three aspects of HR development, on baseline HR, HR reactivity during TSST-G, and on HR recovery after TSST-G.
But the Senate never voted on HR 3354.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com