These results, beyond bringing evidence on potential ways for symbols to get meaning on a biologically realistic way, open a set of possibilities for further uses of conceptual spaces on a much more complex problem: the grounding of a grammatical language.
The paper introduces the notions of framing and reframing of conceptual spaces based on empirical studies as the driver for this research.
This new formulation, based on the idea of conceptual space, redefines some terms and includes several types of concept properties (appropriateness and relevance), whose relationship facilitates the computational implementation of the transformational creativity mechanism.
The capturing of motion allows 3-D animation to be used in the service of conceptual space.
Interestingly, all such direct-object roles form a continuous region in one way or another on the conceptual space of indirect roles.
In this paper we propose a reflection on the role that Conceptual Spaces, a framework developed by Gärdenfors (2000) more than fifteen years ago, can play in the current development of the Knowledge Level in Cognitive Systems and Architectures.
As hypothesized by the dimensional approach to emotion [ 52, 53], the representation of the emotional domain was based on a conceptual space defined by two exes, arousal and hedonic value.
In particular we focus on the advantages offered by Conceptual Spaces (with respect to symbolic and sub-symbolic approaches) in dealing with the problem of compositionality of representations based on typicality traits.
