on all countries

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "on all countries" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used when referring to something that applies universally to every country, but the phrasing is awkward and unclear. Example: "The new policy will have an impact on all countries involved in the agreement."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"I have been repeatedly calling on all countries, particularly in Europe and the extended Middle East, to allow Syrians to access asylum and enjoy quality protection".

The Guardian

"In view of the continued risks emanating from Iran, the F.A.T.F. is calling on all countries around the world to advise their financial institutions to pay special attention to financial dealings with Iran," he said.

The New York Times

No More Epidemics is calling on all countries to publish their completed assessments of national capacities to prevent, detect and respond to epidemic threats, known as the Joint External Evaluation JEEE).

HuffPost

It nonetheless claims to be willing to enter into an alternative emissions-cutting agreement, such as the one outlined by the Europeans, so long as it is equally binding on all countries.

The Economist

Light shines on all countries, infinitely.

The New York Times

That would increase the pressure on all countries," said Rehn.

The Guardian

"Russia repudiates Washington's policy of imposing its extraterritorial jurisdiction on all countries.

The Guardian

The Geneva conventions drawn up after the war are an obligation on all countries.

The Guardian

"To this end, Ankara needs to have persuasive power on all countries of the region.

The New York Times

Countries also violate GATT's policy requiring that any restraints on imports be imposed on all countries.

The New York Times

Not me!" Trump calls on all countries to "isolate" Iran, in a speech in Riyadh.

The Guardian - Business

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for grammatical precision, replace "on all countries" with more precise alternatives such as "in all countries" or "across all nations".

Common error

Be wary of using "on all countries" in formal writing. It might be misinterpreted; instead, opt for a clearer phrasing like "in all countries" to ensure your message is accurately understood.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "on all countries" functions as a prepositional phrase that attempts to modify a verb or noun, indicating the scope or range of an action or attribute. While frequently used, Ludwig AI identifies that the phrasing is not correct in standard written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

73%

Science

16%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Academia

2%

Encyclopedias

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "on all countries" is frequently encountered, Ludwig AI points out that it's not grammatically sound. It aims to express universality, primarily appearing in news and media contexts. For enhanced clarity and grammatical correctness, particularly in formal writing, consider using alternatives like "in all countries" or "across all nations". These substitutes ensure a clearer and more precise expression of the intended meaning. Be mindful of context to choose the most appropriate phrasing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

for all nations

Replaces "countries" with "nations", offering a slightly more formal tone.

for every country

Uses "every" to emphasize individual inclusion, slightly changing the focus.

across all nations

Substitutes "on" with "across", implying a wider scope of influence.

in all countries

Employs "in" to suggest inclusion within each country, slightly altering the perspective.

for all member states

Specifies "member states", narrowing the scope to countries within an organization.

for the entire world

Replaces "countries" with a global term, broadening the application.

universally

Uses an adverb to denote application to everything, simplifying the structure.

worldwide

Single word indicating something affecting the entire world, replacing the original phrase.

on a global scale

Expresses the idea of affecting all countries in a more descriptive way.

internationally

Specifies the global nature of something affecting multiple countries, using a single word.

FAQs

How can I correctly use the idea of "on all countries" in a sentence?

While the phrase "on all countries" is common, it's often grammatically awkward. Consider using "in all countries" or "across all nations" for better clarity.

Is there a difference between "on all countries" and "in all countries"?

Yes, while both aim to convey universality, "in all countries" is generally considered more grammatically correct and clearer than "on all countries". Using "in all countries" avoids potential ambiguity.

What are some alternatives to using "on all countries" that sound more formal?

For formal contexts, consider phrases like "for all nations", "across all nations", or "internationally". These options offer precision and formality.

When is it acceptable to use "on all countries"?

While commonly used, "on all countries" isn't strictly correct. It's preferable to use alternatives like "in all countries" in most contexts. However, its usage might be acceptable in informal settings where precise grammar is not paramount.